Researchers: Sarah de Andrade e Andrade, Ruth Maria da Costa Ataíde, Venerando Amaro Eustáquio, Zoraide Sousa Pessoa
Summary:
The project entitled “Climate change and experiences and knowledge in the local space: a Real World Experiment in Ponta Negra, Natal/RN” – shortened, for reference, by the word VIVERES – is linked to the extension project Fórum Direito à Cidade** and the research project “Brazilian urban areas in a transdisciplinary perspective: assessment, scenarios and solutions for adaptation to climate change and sustainable development” by INCT Klimapolis.
The changes in climate behavior generated by anthropogenic activity have had significant impacts on human and non-human life around the world. It is no coincidence that the most vulnerable countries, territories, cities, and spaces, which typically contribute little to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, are those that suffer most from extreme events (ECLAC, 2011). This is compounded by the material and immaterial consequences of a predatory (almost universal) model of urbanization that impedes, especially in Brazil, the achievement of sustainable urban development.
Faced with the challenge of adapting contemporary lifestyles, especially in cities, to cope with such events, applied research—such as that developed in Real World Laboratories (RLLs)—is an important tool for developing science-based solutions while respecting the identity, reality, and experiences of those living in the territories under discussion.
In LMRs, Real-World Experiments (RMEs) are developed, an approach that combines diverse types of knowledge to empower leaders to drive improvements in their communities, driving sustainable urban development at the local level (Real-World Experiment, n.d.). Despite maintaining their terminology, Laboratories and Experiments do not take place within the confines of traditional scientific laboratories. Rather, they seek to study and experiment in environments that cannot be controlled, considering the inherent complexity of social, environmental, and technological systems, for the exchange of knowledge and the co-production of knowledge. Therefore, both the product—the prototype, simulation, policy, plan, project, construction, etc.—and the process and the learning it provides are important.
In this sense, the VIVERES project is supported by the intention of creating a shared environment for reflection and development of adaptation solutions for the neighborhood and the Ponta Negra Beach shoreline. There, in 2024, the
largest climate adaptation project in the city of Natal – capital of Rio Grande do Norte – the hydraulic landfill or expansion of Ponta Negra Beach.
The process that resulted in the project, initiated in 2012, was a gateway to deepening contacts and strengthening ties between professors, researchers, and extension workers from the Department of Architecture, Public Policy, and Civil and Environmental Engineering. This connection, along with the similarity in the methodological approaches used in their respective projects, led to the partnership between the Right to the City Forum extension project and the INCT Klimapolis. These institutions form the "academic core" of the EMR.
The project's "community core" is made up of social agents engaged in organizations and grassroots groups fighting for better living conditions in the neighborhood and in Vila de Ponta Negra, one of the local Special Areas of Social Interest (AEIS), as well as for their voices to be heard in the planning and management of the territory. Faced with this problem—the government's disregard for local experiences and knowledge in the implementation of the Ponta Negra Beach hydraulic landfill—these groups co-created (Schäpke et al., 2018) as a coping strategy, a science-based grassroots planning and urban management instrument to address the ecological crisis. This is the Urban-Environmental Sectoral Plan in light of the climate emergency.
Beginning its second year of activities, the VIVERES project has been conducting a series of workshops, guided by social mapping tools, as a co-production exercise (Schäpke et al., 2018) of the Popular Sectoral Plan. This is because the lived and desired/future scenarios—elaborated through a different way of occupying/living space—presented in the dialogue workshops serve as the fuel for the development of territorial adaptation measures. These will be systematized by academic agents and validated (or not) in feedback workshops by the EMR agents.
Regarding the experimental nature of the proposal – seeking to go beyond the generation of theoretical knowledge, without dispensing with it (Schäpke et al., 2018) – it is understood that this will be given by the design/project/simulation of the sector's adaptation measures, a stage that has not yet been carried out.
Regarding the roles of agents and their impact on methodological procedures, it is important to note that, apparently, the international literature on LMRs and EMRs almost always focuses on "professional" local agents, with some technical knowledge and experience in the research field. Here, however, we are dealing with a heterogeneous group of residents, workers, and socio-environmental activists seeking to create a product that represents them in the context of governance for sustainable development.
Considering the potential for promoting local impact and empowerment actions, the close relationship/dependence between context, process, and product ultimately limits the potential for generalization of the strategies adopted by the VIVERES project. This limitation, however, is not unique to the project and is also documented in international literature. From this perspective, the project evaluation process should "[...] involve weakening classic quality criteria, such as reliability and external validity, in the name of greater ecological validity (the study context is closer to the real world)" (Schäpke et al., 2018, p. 106).
Concluding this brief reflection on the co-creation/co-production/co-evaluation cycle (Schäpke et al., 2018) of the VIVERES project, we understand that, due to the nature of the methodology and its starting point—a real problem—evaluation processes focused solely on tangible and documentable results may not achieve their true impacts. Therefore, it is also important to focus on/evaluate the limits and possibilities of the listening methodology; the strength and quality of the relationships developed between the participating agents; the promotion of processes of popular engagement and empowerment of local leaders, as well as the incorporation of new activists into the climate change agenda; the consolidation or expansion of knowledge about climate change; the appropriation of urban governance tools, among others.
** Anchored in the Housing Laboratory – LabHabitat of DARQ/UFRN, its activities are based on the principle of democratic city management, working with the residents of Natal's popular communities to develop strategies to, on the one hand, reaffirm and enforce, through public authorities, institutionalized social achievements in the form of the right to housing, transportation, leisure, etc., and, on the other, contribute to the strengthening of community-based policies capable of building creative, counter-hegemonic narratives and actions. Since its creation in 2018, the Forum has maintained a partnership with the Institute of Public Policies (IPP/UFRN) and the INCT Observatory of Metropolitan Areas Natal Center. More recently, since 2023, it has also partnered with INCT Klimapolis.
Free
Registration
Registrations must be made using the form that will be made available soon.
Selection will be made in order of registration.
Registration will be open until the start of the activity, on site, as long as there are spaces available.